Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Kenya: Ways Forward

Following on yesterday's press conference, The EU Observer Mission’s 15 page preliminary report emphasizes that the most serious irregularities occurred in the tallying of the votes. Excerpts:

In a large number, almost a third, of polling stations visited, party agents were not given a copy of the result sheets, either because the form was not available or they did not request a copy. Furthermore, in more than a third of polling stations visited, the results were not posted at the polling station level fundamentally undermining transparency measures in the process. The aggregation of results in the tally centres was delayed and also lacked transparency in many constituencies. EU observers noted variations in the procedures used in some of these centres, depending largely on time and logistical constraints. The combination of the lack of transparency and variations in procedures meant that the observation role played by local party agents and observers was restricted in this part of the election process.

In Central Province, the majority of EU EOM observer teams experienced difficulties in obtaining the results for each polling station from Returning Officers during the tally process. In several constituencies including Mathioya, Kaloleni, Mvita, Kisauni, Changamwe, Likoni and Central/North Imenti, the Returning Officers refused to provide constituency results to EU EOM observers before these results were confirmed in Nairobi. The constituency results form in Kangema showed to EU EOM observers was only signed by a party agent of PNU. A number of party agents reported that they were refused copies of result forms. Furthermore, according to the ECK Chairman, some Returning Officers were reported to have disappeared after completion of the tallying process in their constituencies.



The solution that the EU Observer Mission is suggesting is an independent audit of the results- Again, as described in the preliminary report:

To enable doubts over the accuracy of the presidential results to be clarified, it is vital that an independent investigation is swiftly conducted and the ECK demonstrates maximum transparency in this period. As an essential step, the results of all polling stations must be swiftly published in newspapers and on the internet to enable an independent audit to be undertaken.


The problem with this solution is that part of the whole dispute that caused the final meltdown during the results meeting at the Kenyatta International Conference Center is that there is in fact disagreement over exactly which results sheets should really count towards the final national total. ODM leaders (and numerous ECK officials and observers) have pointed out that in numerous constituencies, result sheets used by the ECK differed substantially from those endorsed by returning officers.

Put differently, there are two possible points in the tallying process where results could have been inflated. The first kind of potentially dishonest tallying is with the actual constituency level results, where votes were being added to particular candidates tallies. With this kind of rigging (which could have either happened while counting at constituencies, or at the ECK headquarters), it should be the case that presidential voter turnout numbers should appear to be substantially higher than parliamentary turnout numbers, and there may be even multiple copies of vote record sheets. The second point at which tallying could have been done incorrectly is when the Electoral Commission of Kenya tallied all of the constituency level votes to get national level vote totals for each candidate. If this kind of malfeasance took place, then it would simply be the case that the total number of votes reported for each candidate nationally does not equal the sum of votes for each candidate received in each constituency.

According to Kenyanpundit (who quotes a journalist’s question from the EU EOM news conference), the audit being suggested by the EU mission would only really address the second kind tallying error:

I asked at the EU EOM press briefing this morning if a complete recount were at all possible, and they said no - a lot of the ballot boxes have been tampered with. The only thing that would be possible is a retally - i.e. take the documented constituency tally and count up again for the national figure. However, obviously this is not going to deal with issues like significant differences between presidential and parliamentary votes in individual constituencies, EU observers being turned away from different polling stations, and extremely high voter turnout.


Similarly, the above statement by the EU, which emphasizes publishing “the results of all polling stations” seemingly ignores the fact that the most contentious part of the election is in fact separating the “real” polling station results from those that were falsified either at the constituency or national level.

Given the shortcomings of solutions suggested by election monitoring missions, as well as the limited viability of turning to the courts, both Kenyanpundit and kenyanjurist are emphasizing that any solution must be political as well as legal. But what would such a political solution look like?

The Nation reports that the three major political candidates, Raila, Kibaki, and Kalonzo (of ODM-Kenya) are close to issuing a joint statement calling for calm in the country. However, it is a big leap from jointly calling for peace to actually forging a government of national unity. Although commentators from the Nation Columnists to Gordon Brown are suggesting such power-sharing arrangements as the way forward, Chris Blattman accurately points out that such suggestions are naïve at best. That said, I personally have no better suggestion for breaking the national-level deadlock- Raila seems unwilling to acknowledge the legitimacy of Kibaki’s claimed electoral victory or to cancel his mass protest scheduled for Thursday and Kibaki seems unwilling to name Raila president or take strong responsibility for the violence that has been going on since this past weekend.

Given that a national-level political solution may take months of negotiations between Raila, Kibaki, and various international actors, it is apparent to me that the immediate solutions to ongoing violence and insecurity are going to need to be local. The Nation’s coverage of the surprising lack of violence in Mlango Kubwa, a Nairobi neighborhood that has experienced a substantial number of clashes in the past, presents one kind of stable local order that might be able to emerge.

Since riots broke out in the city on Sunday, no major incidents have been reported in Mlango Kubwa.

“There are some hooligans who came from Mathare 4A area and started setting some kiosks on fire,” a trader said. He said the residents repulsed the gangsters. After that incident, elders resolved that the residents should not engage in the chaos.

“Here it is peaceful. Fighting is going on a few kilometres away from here, but we are keeping guard to make sure no one comes to incite people to fight one another,” said Mzee Juma Hussein. There were several groups on Juja Road who were keeping vigil to ensure no one entered the slum to cause unrest, as happened on Sunday when some shops were burnt.Mzee Hussein said residents of Mlango Kubwa want nothing to do with the chaos.

A survey by the Nation on Tuesday established that it was business as usual in Mlango Kubwa. Kiosk owners sold foodstuff and other wares.



Although we know that local conflicts can shape violence through a process of alliance with national level ethnic divisions
, the challenge in Kenya will be to do the reverse-to rebuild national level political order from systems of community governance that have survived (and perhaps been transformed by) the polarizing national elections.

11 comments:

Laia Balcells said...

super interesting! whereby the community vetoes the violents, peace remains...what can be explanatory of the former? this has some links with my findings for spain, altough the nature of violence was different (not riots, but selective one). anyway. let's see what happens. the whole situation is right now very scary....happy new year!

Cyrus said...

I put a comment on Chris's blog yesterday that may challenge the faith put into "local solutions." First, if participation in violence is largely determined by the extent to which one is frustrated by discrimination, favoritism, or other barriers to realizing one's potential, then "local solutions" are only available to the extent that the relevant barriers operate at the local level. But is this the case here? Or are we talking about macro level barriers (e.g. mass discrimination organized across ethnic lines)?

Second, in my own examination of conflict histories in developing societies, I have found that "local solutions" tend to be conservative. That is, local institutions tend to police the barriers against which mass protest is rallying. Without being too teleological, one could say that their erosion is part of the modernization process. Thus, CDF mobilization in Sierra Leone, for example, was a conservative, counter-insurgent response to the RUF. The "local solution" was effective because this conservative movement was both allied with foreign interveners and sufficiently effective in mobilizing people to preserve the status quo. As a contrasting example, rebel mobilization in Burundi thoroughly transgressed "local institutions" precisely because these local institutions were erected to police, at the local level, the type of mass discrimination that rebels sought to overthrow. No "local solution" was imaginable in this case. Thus, whose interests would "local solutions" in Kenya satisfy?

amelia said...

per cyrus's comment, ryan, i'm interested to know how folks on the ground view participation in the unrest.

it seems to me that opportunities for nonviolent participation are pretty much nil in kenya at this point -- or is that just a symptom of new york times readership? (relatedly: anybody know of violent opposition movements that then *scaled back* to non-violent protests?) so i assume that the working hypothesis of the "local solution" is that participation = violence, hence ending violence = ending participation. yes?

i'd say that the cdf in SL formed along those lines, motivated less by counter-insurgent conservative ideology and more by an opposition to the RUF's use of totally wacko, indiscriminate, and seemingly apolitical violence.

on an (almost) entirely different note: ryan, what do we know about how violence is organized? i've spent a lot of time lately thinking about how opportunistic violence by armed groups compares to opportunistic violence that is less organized.

Cyrus said...

I don't really get Amelia's alternative take on the CDF, but that aside, I'm going to be intentionally provocative here:

Why is the notion of "opportunistic violence" useful for interpreting what is happening in Kenya? Perhaps it occurs here and there amidst the broader ferment motivated by interest in social change or expression of frustration. If you look for episodes of opportunistic violence, you will find it. But whether it counts for much is another thing. Is there reason to believe that is does count for much?

Ryan Sheely said...

Amelia discusses her interest in opportunistic violence in more depth here.

I think your question is a good one- I like the way that you are putting personal and political grievances front and center in the analysis of this issue- I think the fact is, at least in the case of what's going on in Kenya now, we don't know just yet what share of participation in violence is opportunistic and what share is an outpouring of frustration and what share is some combination of the two. In the accounts I've read over the last week, as well as from my experience in the field, I think both lenses have use in understanding the process that are unfolding in Kenya.

Anonymous said...

World of Warcraft power leveling wow power leveling,wow power levelingisan online role-playing experience set in the award-winninguniverse.wow gold,wow power leveling Players assume the roles of wow power leveling heroes as they explore, wow gold,wow gold,WoW Goldadventure,and quest across a vast world. is a
"Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game" WoW Gold,wow gold,wow power leveling.wow power levelingwhich allows thousands of players to
interact within the same world. Whether adventuring together or fighting against each
other in epic battlesplayers will form friendships, wow power leveling,wow power leveling,wow power levelingwow powerlevelingforge alliances,and compete with enemies for power leveling and glory.wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,wow gold,buy wow gold As a wow power leveling online game, enables thousands of players to come together online and battle against theand each other. Cheap WoW Gold,Cheap WoW Gold,cheap wow gold,cheap wow gold,World Of Warcraft gold,Players from across the globe can leave the real world behind and undertake grand quests and heroic exploits in a land of fantastic adventure. world of warcraft gold,world of warcraft gold,world of warcraft gold,Unlike other cheap opponents. cheap wow gold,buy wow gold,Below are some features found in wow powerleveling

Unknown said...

">ソニー損保
婚約指輪
結婚指輪
知多半島 ホテル
知多半島 温泉
知多半島 旅館
コンタクトレンズ
カラーコンタクト
カーボンオフセット
海外推广
国际推广
网络营销
网络推广
ゼネラリ
チューリッヒ
不動産
不動産投資
お見合いパーティー
浮気調査
賃貸
埼玉 不動産
群馬 不動産

Unknown said...

自動車保険 比較
自動車 保険 見積
出会い
出会い系
不動産
出会い系サイト
国際協力
治験
人権問題
盲導犬
自動車 保険 見積
三井ダイレクト
24そんぽ24
スニーカー
フランチャイズ
キャッシュバック 即日
セルライト
タイ古式マッサージ

Unknown said...

不動産 広島
広島 不動産
岡山 不動産
高知 不動産
徳島 不動産
高松 不動産
芳療
精油
障害者
結婚相談所 横浜
結婚相談所 東京
広島 不動産
アクサダイレクト
野生動物
自動車保険
出会いサイト
アメリカンホームダイレクト
募金
アスクル

Unknown said...

I am working at Rsorder.com, which is providing cheap runescape gold ,rs items, runescape money , rs account and rs powerleveling with fast delivery.What you say is very funny and your thought rs gold is so new , which is also easy to be understood. However, i also want to say i am hope for more here. Better to remain silent and be thought a fool that to speak and remove all cheap rs gold doubt.

Richard Ressinger said...

why did kenya became so polarized? similar scenes every single election, boycots, violence, re-runs and unusual amount of voting violations, elections should not only be monitored, but also supported to make sure this never happens again. the unrest hurts pockets of ordinary people as well, so they go for safe-haven investments such as runescape gold